![]() |
|||||
This document is an attempt to define and describe the concept of "emergence" and why we are interested in studying it in the Emergent Phenomena Research Group at Bryn Mawr College. This paper, like emergence itself, is the product of the interactions of a number of agents. Please feel free to be an agent by helping to write this document. Nothing is sacred; anything can be changed, including this sentence.
One method to figuring out how something works is to take it apart. Dismantling things, such as a radio or a poem, allows one to focus on the particular pieces. Each piece can be then studied in isolation.
This methodology has been the main tool in science for at least the last couple millennia. Sometimes called reductionism,
All of us are trying to make sense of the world, by habitual ways of thinking that shape how we organize new observations and new questions (both those we ask and those we don't). Periodically, because new ways of making observations arise, new frameworks for thinking also evolve. Like telescopes and microscopes, computers have opened up a whole new world of possible observations.
The concept of emergence has proved useful for biologists, physicists, chemists, computer scientists; for psychologists, historians and economists...as well as for sculptors, visual artists, multimedia performance artists, film makers and computer game makers. It is very also useful as a way of thinking about how to set up and run a classroom so that new discoveries can be made. Teachers who are interested in the emergence of "emergent systems" as a way of thinking are invited to join this discussion.
Because they can calculate so rapidly, computers have made it possible to explore the consequences of relatively simple interactions of relatively simple things in ways that were never possible before. From this new capability are emerging significant insights into phenomena long believed too complex for serious analysis--as well as a new general framework for thinking about how novel properties or substances arise out of simpler entities.
What happens in our Emergence Group is clear evidence of this process. Recently, for instance, Paul came in w/ a series of (elaborately backed-up) propositions about the need for information loss and death, in order for new levels of complexity to emerge. By the end of a long hour's interaction among us all, w/ several of us providing the punch lines along the way, we arrived together @ several very different claims: that information, like energy, is not actually lost, but instead transformed, as it "moves up to another level," forming a category, an abstraction. We began w/ death; we ended w/ resurrection. THAT's emergence working as a pedagogy.